MedNEWS

New Laboratory Test To Detect Human Infections With Avian Influenza A/H5 Viruses

Mike — Fri, 03 Mar 2006 17:05:13 +0000

HHS’ Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today announced the approval of a new laboratory test to diagnose H5 strains of influenza in patients suspected to be infected with the virus. The test was developed by another HHS agency, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The product approved today is called the Influenza A/H5 (Asian lineage) Virus Real-time RT-PCR Primer and Probe Set. The test provides preliminary results on suspected H5 influenza samples within four hours once a sample arrives at the lab and testing begins. Previous testing technology would require at least two to three days to render results. If the presence of the H5 strain is identified, then further testing is conducted to identify the specific H5 subtype (e.g., H5N1).

“This laboratory test is a major step forward in our ability to more quickly detect cases of H5 avian influenza and provides additional safeguards to protect public health,” HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt said. “Thanks to the expeditious and collaborative efforts of CDC and FDA, the availability of this new test gives us one more tool to keep up with the ever changing nature of influenza viruses.”

Since December 2003, more than 160 human cases of avian flu caused by the H5N1 strain of influenza have been reported in Thailand, China, Vietnam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Turkey and Iraq. More than half of the people infected with the H5N1 virus have died. Nearly all of these cases are believed to have been caused by exposure to infected poultry. The concern is that H5N1 will evolve into a virus capable of human-to-human transmission and lead to an influenza pandemic.

“Preparing for a possible flu pandemic is a top priority for our nation, and FDA acted quickly to evaluate and expedite CDC’s request for approval of this test,” Acting FDA Commissioner Dr. Andrew von Eschenbach said. “Using flexible regulatory authorities, FDA was able to prioritize this expedited approval based on the clear critical need without compromising the quality or integrity of the FDA review process.”

A flu pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus emerges for which people have little or no immunity and for which there is no vaccine. In an influenza pandemic, the disease spreads easily from person to person in a sustained manner, causes serious illness, and can sweep across the country and around the world in very short time. It is difficult to predict when the next influenza pandemic will occur or how severe it will be.

This test will be distributed to Laboratory Response Network (LRN)-designated laboratories to enhance early detection and surveillance activities as well as increase laboratory response capacity associated with a potential pandemic. Domestically the LRN is a system of about 140 labs in all 50 states. LRN labs have special experience and training in molecular testing methods, special bio-safety facilities and containment procedures as well as communication networks connected to public health programs across the country. The testing kits will be distributed by CDC beginning next week. CDC has also shared the test technology with the World Health Organization and its collaborating centers around the world.

“The use of this test by laboratories that are part of the LRN, in conjunction with other laboratory testing and clinical observations, may enable earlier detection of influenza cases caused by this specific virus and allow public health agencies to investigate sources of infection and more quickly respond with control and prevention activities,” said CDC Director Dr. Julie Gerberding.

Information obtained from this test will be used to track cases of illness with this strain of virus. Testing for this virus is indicated when a patient has symptoms of severe respiratory illness and a risk of exposure (e.g., direct contact with sick, dead or infected poultry in a country with outbreaks of influenza H5N1 among poultry).

CDC recommends that testing for influenza A/H5 (Asian lineage) should be considered on a case-by-case basis in consultation with local or state health departments. If a clinician suspects a patient may be infected with an avian influenza virus, they should contact their state or local health department. CDC’s full recommendations are available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm55e203a1.htm. Further information on the expedited review process used by FDA for this approval can be found at: http://www.fda.gov/oc/opacom/hottopics/avianflu/process.html.

For information on pandemic influenza, state summits and preparedness activities go to http://www.pandemicflu.gov.

Pilot Study to test Mobile phone radiation effect

Mike — Fri, 03 Mar 2006 12:32:34 +0000

Research Professor Dariusz Leszczynski said on Friday, a pilot study to be conducted in next week and which expose a small area of skin on volunteers’ arms to cellphone radiation for the duration of a long phone call, or for one hour. Researchers then take a skin sample to study and compare with one taken before the radiation exposure.Leszczynski’s group found evidence of mobile phone radiation causing cell-level changes such as shrinkage, but he said it was still impossible to say if that had significant health effects. The results of the study are due by the end of the year.

Source:

- Reuters Health

Vaccine (Streptorix) reduces ear infection in toddlers

Mike — Fri, 03 Mar 2006 01:55:18 +0000

Researchers at the University of Defense in Hradec Kralove in the Czech Republic tested a New Vaccine from GlaxoSmithKline Plc, against middle ear infection, or otitis media, reduced cases of the illness by about 30 percent in babies who had been vaccinated in the first six months of life. Roman Prymula et al, in their Phase III trial results Published in Lancet says that a reduction in ear, nose and throat specialist-confirmed episodes of acute otitis media by about a third in infants in the vaccine group compared with controls. The researchers tested the vaccine on nearly 5,000 infants who were either given three doses of the new vaccine — Streptorix — and a booster before 15-months-old or a vaccine for hepatitis A. Children who received the hepatitis vaccine acted as the control group. They reported that the study showed a statistically significant and clinically relevant reduction in episodes of acute otitis media.

Glaxo plans to submit the product for regulatory approval in Europe in 2007.

- Reuters Health

FDA recommendations in developing influenza vaccines.

Mike — Thu, 02 Mar 2006 01:57:43 +0000

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today issued recommendations to aid manufacturers in developing seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccines. FDA’s goal is to expedite the development and availability of safe and effective vaccines needed to protect against influenza.

“This action illustrates FDA’s high level of commitment and key role in preparing for influenza pandemic, which is a top priority for our nation” said Acting FDA Commissioner Dr. Andrew von Eschenbach.

In two guidance documents released today, one for seasonal, and the other for pandemic influenza vaccines, the FDA provides manufacturers with clear guidance on developing and submitting clinical data to show safety and effectiveness for new vaccines. Consistent with the aims of FDA’s Critical Path Initiative to get products to market more quickly and to advance the development and use of new technologies, these documents outline specific approaches that vaccine developers may follow.

For licensed vaccines, they describe the process for changing rapidly from the currently-licensed seasonal vaccine to a new pandemic vaccine by supplementing the existing license. For new vaccines, they describe defined pathways for both traditional and accelerated approval approaches. Accelerated approval allows for evaluation based on biological indicators (e.g., the immune response to the vaccine) likely to demonstrate effectiveness.

Because these guidances will assist manufacturers in the development and evaluation of seasonal and pandemic influenza, the direction that they provide to new manufacturers, in turn, helps address the increased demand for influenza vaccine. The guidance also helps support and defines steps needed for development and evaluation of vaccines using new technologies (such as cell culture and recombinant manufacturing) and potential approaches to stretching limited pandemic vaccine supplies (such as with the use of ingredients added to a vaccine to improve the immune response it produces, known as adjuvants and different vaccine delivery methods).

The accelerated approval pathway was critical in allowing last year’s rapid approval of a new influenza vaccine, Fluarix, and broke new ground in that it was the first vaccine approved using that approval process.

In issuing this advice, FDA aims to facilitate manufacturers in increasing the number of doses to ensure that enough influenza vaccine is available to vaccinate each person in the at-risk population. Having additional diversity in our vaccine supply helps enhance the capacity to produce more doses of influenza vaccine and contributes to the nation’s pandemic preparedness.

“These guidance documents provide important advice for manufacturers on how to develop needed vaccines more quickly,” said Dr. Jesse Goodman, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA. “FDA is committed to helping companies develop safe and effective vaccines to prevent influenza, including pandemic influenza, and is very engaged with product developers.”

The release of these guidances is part of the comprehensive effort that FDA is undertaking to work with manufacturers to facilitate the development of vaccines. Other examples include a recent CBER advisory committee meeting to discuss novel approaches to develop influenza vaccine such as using cell technology rather than eggs, frequent interactions with vaccine manufacturers to provide both scientific and regulatory guidance, as well as CBER’s preparation of material for testing the potency of new vaccines, which are made available to manufacturers.

A copy of the guidance, “Draft Guidance for Industry, Clinical Data Needed to Support the Licensure of Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccines,” is available at: http://www.fda.gov/cber/gdlns/trifluvac.pdf.

A copy of the guidance, “Draft Guidance for Industry, Clinical Data Needed to Support the Licensure of Pandemic Influenza Vaccines,” is available at: http://www.fda.gov/cber/gdlns/panfluvac.pdf.

The public has 90 days to comment on the drafts. When finalized, the guidances will represent the FDA’s current thinking on these topics

FDA Approves First Head & Neck Cancer Treatment

Mike — Wed, 01 Mar 2006 16:40:12 +0000

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today announced the approval of Erbitux (cetuximab) for use in combination with radiation therapy to treat patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN) that can not be removed by surgery (unresectable SCCHN). This is the first drug approved for head and neck cancer that has shown a survival benefit in this population. Erbitux was also approved today for use alone (monotherapy) to treat patients whose head and neck cancer has spread (metastasized) despite the use of standard chemotherapy.
“Patients suffering from all forms of cancer have a common goal – to treat the disease and prolong life,” said Steven Galson, MD, Director of FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. “We consider this approval an important advance in the treatment of head and neck cancer because it has been shown to help some patients live longer. The approval of Erbitux monotherapy to shrink tumors in patients with metastatic disease who no longer respond to other forms of treatment is also important. Patients need as many effective treatment options as possible.”

Erbitux, which received a priority review, is the first drug approved to treat head and neck cancer since methotrexate became available in the 1950s. Approval of Erbitux in combination with radiation therapy was based on a study that showed it prolonged survival by 20 months compared to treatment with radiation alone. Approval of Erbitux monotherapy was based on evidence of tumor shrinkage in 13 percent of patients, lasting on average of 6 months. Standard cancer statistics databases estimate that there are about 29,000 new cases of head and neck cancer diagnosed every year in the United States.

The safety and effectiveness of Erbitux was established in two studies. The randomized clinical trial of 424 patients using Erbitux in combination with radiation therapy showed a survival time of 49 months versus 29.3 months on radiation therapy alone. In addition, delay in tumor growth was observed with the use of Erbitux and radiation, compared to radiation alone. Since tumor growth is associated with pain, difficulties swallowing, speaking and eating, control of tumor growth as long as possible is important for the patients’ well being. In a second trial of 103 patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN, Erbitux helped to shrink the patients’ tumors after the tumors no longer responded to platinum-based therapy, the current standard treatment for patients with this difficult to treat disease.

Commonly reported side effects of Erbitux were infusion reactions (fever, chills), skin rash, fatigue/malaise, nausea. The common side effects associated with radiation such as sore mouth, trouble swallowing, and radiation skin changes were similar in frequency in patients receiving Erbitux plus radiation and those receiving radiation alone.

Erbitux is manufactured by ImClone Systems Inc., Branchburg, NJ and will be distributed and marketed by Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Princeton, NJ.

Source:

FDA New Approvals March 1, 2006

Computer Model May Help Develop Drugs To Combat Cancer, Septic Shock And Other Ills

Mike — Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:58:55 +0000

Drawing on lab experiments and computer studies, Johns Hopkins researchers have learned how a common protein delivers its warning message to cells when an infectious agent invades the body. The findings are important because this biological intruder alarm causes the body’s immune system to leap into action to fight the infection. Learning more about how this process works, the researchers said, could lead to better treatments for diseases that occur when the immune system overreacts or pays too little attention to the infection alarm.

Collaborating with colleagues at the University of California, San Diego, the Johns Hopkins researchers have used their discoveries to develop a new computer model that could help produce medications for immune system-related ailments including septic shock, cancer, lupus and rheumatoid arthritis.

Their findings, which focused on how a large protein molecule called tumor necrosis factor, or TNF, triggers an immune response, were reported in the February issue of the Journal of Biological Chemistry.

“We were surprised by how sensitive cells were to small amounts and brief exposures to TNF,” said Andre Levchenko, a Johns Hopkins assistant professor of biomedical engineering and senior author of the paper. “Our analysis may help drug companies solve problems with the regulation of immune response levels, and do it in a smart way.”

In particular, Levchenko’s team looked at the innate immune response, a localized reaction which normally stops an infection threat confined to a small part of the body, such as in the case of a pricked finger. (This is in contrast to a systemic response that triggers an immune reaction throughout the body, causing a fever. If the immune system responds too aggressively in such cases, the result may be a dangerous condition called septic shock.)

The innate immune response begins when white blood cells detect a bacterial intruder or toxin in the body. They produce TNF to carry a message about this health threat to neighboring blood vessel cells, asking them to join in the fight. To send this message, a TNF molecule latches onto the surface of a neighboring cell and accesses a biological information highway called the NF-kappaB pathway. Via a series of chemical reactions that act like signals traveling over a telephone wire, TNF’s message moves along this pathway from the cell’s surface to its nucleus.

At the end of this pathway, NF-kappaB molecules are released to carry the alarm into the nucleus, the cell’s control center. Inside the nucleus, the NF-kappaB molecules switch on genes that produce infection-fighting proteins. These proteins launch several strategies to fight the microscopic invaders, such as sending more white blood cells to engulf the bacteria or toxins. The proteins also set off a response known as inflammation, characterized by redness, swelling and pain.

In their journal article, Levchenko and his colleagues reported several important new discoveries about this cellular signaling system. “You could think of the TNF molecule, which sounds the alarm, as a very weak radio transmitter. It moves very slowly as it carries its warning message to neighboring cells, so it is unable to send that message over long distances,” Levchenko said. “However, we discovered that the cellular pathways that pick up this signal act like extremely sensitive radio receivers. They can pick up the alarm message from exposure to even a very small amount of TNF. This turns out to be a very smart strategy on the part of the cells.”

He explained that a pricked finger usually generates a very localized fight against infection, involving only nearby cells. If TNF’s signal was strong enough to set off an immune response involving the entire body, the result could be a high fever and septic shock. “We’ve developed a better understanding of why the fight against a local infection stays local,” said Raymond Cheong, a graduate student in Levchenko’s lab and lead author of the journal article.

The researchers also found that as TNF’s warning message travels from the surface of a cell to its nucleus, it receives critical help from a molecule called Inhibitor of KappaB Kinase, or IKK. “IKK filters and interprets the warning message,” said Cheong, who is an M.D.-Ph.D. candidate in the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. “It carefully controls the level of the immune system’s response.”

That makes IKK a very promising target for new medications designed to boost or suppress the immune system, the researchers said. An overactive immune system, for example, can set off the excessive inflammation associated with rheumatoid arthritis and lupus. In addition, some cancers are more likely to grow where inflammation occurs. These ailments might be helped by a drug that curbs inflammation by reducing the sensitivity of IKK. Still other diseases that are characterized by a weak inflammatory response might be helped by a drug that makes IKK even more sensitive to infection messages.

The researchers believe their computer model of this cellular alarm system, which was refined through lab testing, should be a great help to medication makers. “Models like this are a wonderful tool for experimental drug testing,” Levchenko said.

###

Funding for the research was provided by the National Institutes of Health and the Medical Scientist Training Program at The Johns Hopkins University. Co-authors of the journal article included Adriel Bergmann, a graduate student in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Johns Hopkins; and Shannon L. Werner, Joshua Regal and Alexander Hoffman, all of the Signaling Systems Laboratory, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego.

Diagram and color images of the Johns Hopkins researchers available; contact Phil Sneiderman.

Related links:
Andre Levchenko’s Lab Page: http://www.bme.jhu.edu/labs/levchenko/
Johns Hopkins Department of Biomedical Engineering: http://www.bme.jhu.edu/
UC San Diego Signaling Systems Laboratory: http://signalingsystems.ucsd.edu/

Contact: Phil Sneiderman
prs@jhu.edu
Johns Hopkins University

Crohn’s Disease – Development Of Teduglutide As Treatment

Mike — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:41:30 +0000

NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq: NPSP) announced today that the company plans to advance the clinical development of its experimental drug teduglutide based upon results achieved in a Phase 2a proof-of-concept study of 100 patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease.

The four-arm, eight-week clinical trial compared three doses of teduglutide delivered by daily subcutaneous injection to a placebo. The study was designed to evaluate the drug’s safety and potential efficacy in the treatment of Crohn’s disease. Overall, the study results showed a positive and consistent trend toward efficacy and a dose response favoring the highest dose group: 36.8% of patients receiving the highest dose of teduglutide reached clinical remission (Crohn’s disease activity index (CDAI) score of less than 150 points) at week two versus 16.7% of the placebo group, while 55.6% of patients in the highest dose group reached clinical remission by week eight compared to 33.3% of the placebo group. Teduglutide was well tolerated with no serious adverse events related to the drug. The most common treatment-related adverse event in the trial was redness at the injection site. Study investigators plan to submit the trial results for presentation at a future medical meeting.

Alan Buchman, M.D., a clinical investigator for the study and associate professor and director of the IBD Center at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine, said, “The results from this preliminary study are encouraging and warrant further study of this novel agent alone or in combination with other drugs as a potential new class of therapy for the treatment of Crohn’s disease. Remission rates of this magnitude at two weeks and eight weeks are unusual in clinical trials and suggest that teduglutide may play an important role in the management of this difficult-to-treat disease.”

Although the study was not powered to demonstrate statistical significance and the primary end point (the percentage of patients who achieved remission or at least a 100-point reduction from their baseline CDAI score at week 8) was not met due to the relatively small number of study subjects and a high placebo response, the company believes the high clinical remission rates seen in patients receiving the highest dose of teduglutide support further dose-ranging efficacy studies of teduglutide in patients with Crohn’s disease.

Hunter Jackson, Ph.D., NPS chairman and CEO, commented, “We are pleased with the results from this trial and the suggestion that some patients demonstrated remission as early as two weeks into the study. The high placebo response seen in this trial is not unusual in Crohn’s disease. We plan to conduct additional studies to confirm the efficacy response observed in this trial and look forward to advancing this novel compound into later-stage development this year as a promising treatment alternative in Crohn’s disease.”

Teduglutide is a proprietary analog of glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2), a naturally occurring hormone that regulates the growth, proliferation and maintenance of cells lining the gastrointestinal tract. A previous Phase 2 clinical study in patients with Short Bowel Syndrome showed that daily subcutaneous injections of teduglutide resulted in significant growth of the intestinal lining and improved dietary absorption of nutrients and fluids. NPS is currently testing teduglutide in a pivotal Phase 3 study as a treatment for Short Bowel Syndrome.

About Crohn’s Disease

Crohn’s disease is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by inflammation of any part of the gastrointestinal tract and associated with chronic morbidity. Crohn’s disease affects nearly one million patients in the United States and Europe.

Conference Call and Webcast Information

NPS will conduct a conference call today at 5:00 p.m. EST with Daniel Present, M.D., clinical professor of medicine at Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, to discuss the teduglutide study. To participate in the call, dial 800-299-7098 and use passcode 59474346. International callers may dial 617-801-9715 and use the same passcode. In addition, live audio of the call will be webcast and may be accessed on the Investor Relations page, Calendar of Events section of the company’s website (http://www.npsp.com). The conference call replay may be accessed by dialing 888-286-8010 (with passcode 42742393). A replay for international callers can be accessed with the same passcode at 617-801-6888. Both the webcast and conference call will be archived until March 6, 2006.

About NPS Pharmaceuticals

NPS discovers, develops and commercializes small molecules and recombinant proteins as drugs, primarily for the treatment of metabolic, bone and mineral, and central nervous system disorders. The company has one FDA-approved product, one product candidate undergoing regulatory review for approval to market in the U.S. and Europe, as well as other drug candidates in various stages of clinical development backed by a strong discovery research effort. Additional information is available on the company’s website, http://www.npsp.com.

Safe Harbor Statement

Note: Statements made in this press release, which are not historical in nature, constitute forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements include those regarding our expectation that teduglutide may be a promising treatment alternative in Crohn’s disease, our intention to advance the clinical development of teduglutide into later-stage development this year, and our intent to commercialize small molecules and recombinant proteins as drugs. These statements are based on management’s current expectations and beliefs and are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include: future clinicals may demonstrate that teduglutide is not safe and/or efficacious; we may not be able to enroll patients in our clinical trials in a timely manner; we may not be able to prepare and finalize clinical protocols in a timely manner to commence additional clinical trials with teduglutide for Crohn’s in a timely manner; we may not be able to collect, analyze and report data from our clinical trials in a timely manner; we may never develop additional products that generate revenues; our product candidates may not prove to be safe or efficacious; the FDA may delay approval or may not approve any of our product candidates; current collaborators or partners may not devote adequate resources to the development and commercialization of our licensed drug candidates which would prevent or delay introduction of drug candidates to the market. All information is as of February 27, 2006, and we undertake no duty to update this information. A more complete description of these risks can be found in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 31, 2005.

NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. http://www.npsp.com

Cefazolin for Injection Recalled

Mike — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 05:58:56 +0000

Hanford Pharmaceuticals has issued a nationwide recall of approximately 380,000 vials of cefazolin for injection that may be contaminated with microorganisms.In a Feb. 24 press release that was circulated today by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Hanford, a New York-based contract manufacturer of sterile injectable products, stated that some lots of the active ingredient used to prepare the cefazolin product were contaminated with Bacillus pumilus, Staphylococcus hominis, Propionibacterium acnes, or Micrococcus luteus.

The recall affects 1-g/10-mL vials of Cefazolin for Injection, USP, lots C4650 and C4537, which were prepared for Sandoz Inc. and lots C4689 and C4665, prepared for Watson Pharmaceuticals. Hanford stated that the recalled cefazolin was targeted for use in hospitals.

Hanford has asked hospitals, clinics, and other recipients of the recalled cefazolin to immediately stop using it. The company stated that it has not received any reports of patients being harmed after receiving the contaminated cefazolin.

Fosamax cuts bone loss in men with prostate cancer

Mike — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:36:25 +0000

Testosterone-lowering therapy — one of the most effective and commonly used therapies for prostate cancer — often causes bone loss. However, once-weekly drug treatment combats the problem, according to a new study. Fosamax, used to treat osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, also helps prevent bone loss associated with so-called “androgen deprivation” treatment of prostate cancer, the researchers reported at the 2006 Prostate Cancer Symposium. “Patients on androgen deprivation therapy tend to lose bone mass early, within the first 6 to 12 months of treatment, and the bone loss continues for the duration of therapy,” noted Dr. Susan L. Greenspan from the University of Pittsburgh. “Currently,” Greenspan noted, “lifelong androgen deprivation therapy is common for advanced prostate cancer, but more recently it has been a common treatment for less aggressive disease.” Bone mass, she said, “should be evaluated in men who are starting therapy to lower testosterone because we are putting them in a situation similar to newly postmenopausal women with a relatively fast rate of bone loss.” In a 2-year study sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, Greenspan and colleagues are evaluating the effects of Fosamax on bone in a group of men with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy. In the ongoing study — now in its second year — 112 men are receiving calcium and vitamin D supplementation and half of them are also taking weekly Fosamax. Greenspan presented 1-year data from a planned interim analysis. At the start of the study, “only about 10 percent of men had normal bone mass,” Greenspan said. “The average duration on androgen deprivation therapy was only about 22 months or roughly 2 years, but 90 percent of them did not have normal bone mass; in fact 39 percent had osteoporosis by WHO criteria.” After 1 year, bone mass increased by 4.9 percent in the spine and by 2.1 percent in the hip among men on Fosamax, compared with decreases of 1.3 percent in the spine and 0.7 percent in the hip among men on placebo. “Once weekly oral (Fosamax) should be considered to prevent this bone loss and prevent the occurrence of osteoporosis and fractures,” Greenspan concluded. The 2006 Prostate Cancer Symposium is co-sponsored by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, the Prostate Cancer Foundation, and the Society of Urologic Oncology.

- Reuters Health

Diabetes Researchers Pioneer Islet Cell Xenotransplantation In Primate Studies

Mike — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:45:45 +0000

A team of researchers from the University of Alberta, the Yerkes National Primate Research Center of Emory University and the Emory Transplant Center has successfully transplanted insulin-producing neonatal porcine islet cells into monkeys, a procedure the researchers say represents a promising intermediate solution to the critical supply problem in clinical islet cell transplantation.
“Our work at the U of A and Emory, along with recent work at the University of Minnesota, is very exciting and shows that xenotransplantation in humans may soon be possible, thus solving the islet supply problem,” says one of the study authors Ray Rajotte, a professor of Surgery at the University of Alberta.

The paper appeared in an advanced on-line publication of Nature Medicine, February 26, entitled “Long-term survival of neonatal porcine islets in non-human primates by targeting co-stimulation pathways.” The work follows on the heels of similar work published last week by University of Minnesota researchers; those researchers used islets isolated from adult pig pancreases.

Neonatal islets were produced in Edmonton using a procedure Drs. Greg Korbutt and Rajotte developed in 1995. The pig islets were sent to the Yerkes Research Center for transplantation into diabetic rhesus macaques using an anti-rejection protocol developed by Drs. Christian Larsen and Kenneth Cardona of the Yerkes Research Center and the Emory Transplant Center. The isolation method developed by the U of A researchers is simple and reproducible with the neonatal pig islets having some growth potential post-transplant, considered a major advantage over adult pig islets.

The diabetic animals were treated with a CD28/CD154 co-stimulation blockade-based immunosuppressive regimen, and achieved sustained insulin independence (median survival >140 days with one animal now at 300 days) without evidence of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) dissemination. “This represents a major step forward and proves neonatal porcine islets can correct diabetes long-term in primates,” said Drs. Korbutt and Rajotte.

“To meet the needs of the millions suffering from type 1 diabetes, we must find new donor sources to allow large-scale application of islet cell transplantation in humans,” said Dr. Larsen. “While there is much work to be done these studies suggest that the rejection response to porcine islets can be surmounted.”

“The next step is to prove that these neonatal porcine islet cells could become a source for human transplantation,” said Dr. Rajotte. “It’s hoped that within the next three to five years, we will be transplanting patients with pig islets once we prove that it is safe.”

Using a relatively simple and reproducible method of obtaining large numbers of islets from neonatal pig pancreata developed at the U of A, the researchers then transplanted islets comprised of endocrine and endocrine precursor cells into the monkeys. In vivo, these cells have been shown to proliferate, differentiate and reverse hyperglycemia in immunodeficient diabetic mice and allogeneic out-bred pigs.

However, humans and Old World primates have naturally occurring antibodies that are directed against antigens that can cause hyperacute or acute humoral rejection. To combat that, the researchers administered an anti-IL-2 receptor and anti-CD154 (H106) antibody, while maintaining immunosuppression using sirolimus and belatacept (a second-generation high affinity derivative of CTLA4-Ig)9-11 on diabetic rhesus macaques transplanted with neonatal porcine islets.

Other researchers involved in the work include: Zvonimir Milas1, James Lyon2, Jose Cano1, Wanhong Jiang1, Hameeda Bello-Laborn1, Brad Hacquoil2, Elizabeth Strobert3, Shivaprakash Gangappa1, Collin Weber1, and Thomas Pearson1. (1. Emory Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta; 2. Surgical-Medical Research Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton,; 3. Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta.)

The research was supported by the Alberta Diabetes Foundation, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Edmonton Civic Employees Charitable Assistance Fund, Canadian Diabetes Association, and University of Alberta Hospital Foundation MacLachlan Fund. Dr. Korbutt received a Career Development Award from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation and a Senior Scholarship from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. The work at Emory was supported by National Institute of Health, the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Center, Yerkes Research Center Base Grant P51-RR000165-45, the McKelvey Lung Transplant Center, and the Carlos and Marguerite Mason Trust.

The Islet Transplant Group at the University of Alberta is involved in all aspects of islet transplantation, from trying to develop an unlimited source of islets (this study) to developing transplant protocols that don’t need anti-rejection drugs or drugs that only need to be given for a short period of time (tolerance induction).

Michael Robb
michael.robb@ualberta.ca
University of Alberta
www.ualberta.ca